Three Crypto Coins Getting Ready to Explode
Video: These 3 Crypto Coins Are Getting Ready To EXPLODE!?
Want articles like this for your own video to promote it on YouTube and Google? Order them through the Telegram bot @sat_sit_bot. Articles with your video embedded are written and posted by the bot itself — on popular topical sites (no ads). Your first 50 articles are free.
· based on the channel Altcoin Daily
Crypto traders looking for the next breakout got a shortlist from Altcoin Daily: Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol are the three coins the channel frames as getting ready to explode. The thesis rests on real usage rather than pure narrative — active trading volume, fee revenue and developer traction — and the channel points followers to its Altcoin Daily X account for the follow-up charts and updates.
What the three crypto picks have in common
The common thread is that all three combine a working product with a token that captures value from activity on the network. Solana processes high transaction throughput and hosts a large share of retail DeFi and meme-coin trading. Hyperliquid runs a perpetual futures exchange on its own chain, where trading fees and gas accrue to the ecosystem rather than to a separate layer. Near Protocol sits in the smart-contract Layer 1 camp and is being marketed on throughput, low fees and its account-abstraction design.
That combination matters because the market has spent several cycles rotating between pure memes and infrastructure. A coin that generates fees has a measurable floor under its valuation, while one that only has a narrative depends entirely on the next wave of buyers. The video's framing is that these three sit closer to the first group.
Solana as the leading high-throughput Layer 1
Solana is presented as the strongest of the three, and the audience largely agrees — several of the most-liked comments call it their number two holding or the best altcoin overall. The bull case is straightforward: the network carries a large share of on-chain trading activity, its ecosystem covers wallets, DeFi, payments and consumer apps, and the token is liquid enough for institutional size.
The risks are equally clear. Solana has suffered high-profile outages in the past, and its performance is tied to the health of retail trading activity, which fades quickly in risk-off markets. Anyone sizing a position should treat it as a high-beta bet on on-chain activity rather than a defensive asset.
Hyperliquid and the perps exchange model
Hyperliquid is the pick built around derivatives. It operates a perpetual futures venue with on-chain order books and its own execution layer, so volume on the exchange translates into demand for the token and for block space. That makes it one of the few crypto assets whose revenue is directly observable on-chain.
Viewers raised a practical counterpoint: gas fees on some competing Layer 2s, Arbitrum among them, can be cheaper for ordinary users. The honest answer is that Hyperliquid competes on trading experience and liquidity depth, not on being the cheapest place to move tokens. Its fate is tied to perpetuals volume, and perps volume is cyclical — it spikes in volatility and dries up in quiet markets.
Near Protocol and the momentum trade
Near Protocol is the momentum name of the trio. The channel treats it as the coin with the most room to re-rate if sentiment turns, and the audience debate centres on price targets — one widely liked comment argues Near could reach $15 this cycle, while others prefer Zcash on the privacy side.
Near's fundamentals rest on low fees, fast finality and account abstraction that lets users sign in without seed phrases, which is attractive for consumer apps. The caveat is that Near has repeatedly lagged the market in previous cycles despite decent technology, so the case here is momentum plus a cheap entry, not a guaranteed breakout. Position sizing should reflect that.
Typical viewer questions about these crypto calls
The comment section shows where the scepticism sits. Several viewers ask why Bittensor (TAO) or Midnight were left out, and the answer is usually about liquidity and revenue visibility rather than technology — TAO is a smaller-cap AI narrative with sharper drawdowns, and Midnight is earlier in its lifecycle. Others push back on the whole premise, noting that October has often disappointed despite the "Uptober" nickname, which is a fair reminder that seasonal patterns are not guarantees.
A recurring theme is portfolio concentration: readers say Near has rescued their portfolio more than once, while others insist Solana is the only altcoin worth holding. Both views are anecdotal. The useful takeaway is to avoid holding three coins that all depend on the same driver — retail risk appetite — without realising it.
Where to follow the analysis
Altcoin Daily publishes the full breakdown on its YouTube channel and posts charts, follow-ups and market commentary on X. The channel's promotional link in the video points to a WEEX welcome offer with a 50% deposit bonus on the first $100: https://www.weex.com/events/welcome-event?vipCode=oz5p&qrType=activity. Treat exchange bonuses as marketing, read the terms, and never deposit more than you can afford to lose.
Conclusion
Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol form a coherent shortlist: one high-throughput Layer 1 with deep liquidity, one derivatives venue that captures its own fees, and one cheaper Layer 1 with momentum behind it. Each carries a distinct risk — outages and retail dependence for Solana, cyclical perps volume for Hyperliquid, and a history of underperformance for Near. The breakdown comes from Altcoin Daily, and the channel's X profile is the place to follow the thesis as it develops.
Key takeaways
- Altcoin Daily highlights Solana, Hyperliquid and Near Protocol as the three coins with the strongest setup in the breakdown.
- Solana is framed as the leading high-throughput Layer 1 with the deepest consumer and DeFi activity.
- Hyperliquid pairs a perpetuals exchange with its own chain, so trading fees and gas flow back into the token economy.
- Near Protocol is pitched as the momentum play, with viewers debating whether it can reach $15 this cycle.
- Viewers also flag Bittensor (TAO), Midnight, Ondo, Aerodrome, Arbitrum and Zcash as alternative candidates.
Questions & answers
Why were Bittensor (TAO) and Midnight not included in the three picks?
The shortlist favours assets with visible revenue and deep liquidity. Bittensor is a smaller-cap AI narrative with sharper drawdowns, and Midnight is earlier in its lifecycle, so both carry more execution risk than the three names discussed. That does not make them bad projects, only higher-beta ones.
Is Near Protocol really capable of reaching $15 this cycle?
That figure comes from viewer speculation, not from the channel's own model. A move to $15 would require a large re-rating of the entire Layer 1 sector plus sustained momentum in Near's ecosystem. Treat it as an upside scenario, not a forecast, and size positions accordingly.
Is Hyperliquid more expensive to use than Arbitrum?
For simple token transfers, gas on Arbitrum can indeed be cheaper. Hyperliquid competes on trading experience, order-book depth and liquidity for perpetual futures, where its fees are competitive. The two serve different purposes, so comparing raw gas costs alone is misleading.
Does the "Uptober" pattern make these coins a safer buy in October?
No. Seasonal nicknames are folklore, and recent Octobers have delivered losses as often as gains. The three picks rest on usage and fee generation, not on calendar effects, so entry timing should depend on your own risk tolerance and position sizing rather than the month.
Source: These 3 Crypto Coins Are Getting Ready To EXPLODE!? · Markdown version